Asher, Alexie, and Dashner: Believe the Women and Ban the Books?

7982497829_0125989382_kI’ll start by saying as clearly as possible, I believe the women (and others) who have accused young adult literature authors Jay Asher, Sherman Alexie, and James Dashner of sexual harassment and other bad behavior. These popular writers have each accepted varying degrees of responsibility for their actions, and each has received criticism and shaming from various corners of his business and fan bases.

All of this comes into play for me because they are the authors of three books that dozens of students have read with my encouragement: Thirteen Reasons Why, The All-True Diary of a Part-Time Indian, and The Maze Runner. These three books have little in common except that they are extremely popular with young readers, and each has ignited a passion for reading in many of my students.

Considering the recent developments involving these authors, I don’t know what to do about these titles. Should I withdraw my endorsements of the books? Should I still encourage students to read them, but temper that encouragement with words of warning about the authors? Should I keep promoting the books and not mention anything about the authors?

It’s easy to say there are plenty of other books available for young readers, and these authors don’t deserve a readership. Although I tend to agree with the second part of that sentiment, I’m not ready to agree to the first part. Yes, there are a lot of other compelling books, but I know for a fact that these books work. They are my go-to books for certain readers, and I’m reluctant to let go of something that works. And after all, the books are not their authors (or are they?).

I understand that encouraging students to read these books means more copies of them will be sold, and Asher, Alexie, and Dashner will gain more monetary profit. That bothers me. However, students who read the books are not sexually harassed by what they find in the pages, and the books do not promote sexual harassment. On the contrary, students derive benefits from reading these books as they engage with the characters, stories, and ideas.

Another aspect of this quandary is that pulling the books from my list of recommended titles feels like a violation of a deeply-held principle of mine: Students should be allowed to read whatever they choose, and all books should be available to them. These books themselves are not worthy of censorship. In fact, in the past I’ve argued with others about the value of not censoring Thirteen Reasons Why and All-True Diary. It seems hypocritical to now shield students from them, not because of their content but because of their authors’ behavior.

But is keeping the books in circulation a slap in the face of the authors’ victims and others? If the answer is Yes, then the books must go. Are readers who have been subjected to this kind of harassment re-humiliated when their teacher promotes a book by a perpetrator? If the answer is Yes, then the books must go.

After thinking through this, I’m forced to admit that maybe the books’ meanings are different now. Is it possible to read the books the same way knowing what we now know about their creators? Probably not. I recently read Jay Asher’s newest book, a graphic novel entitled Piper (recommended to me by a student). I had to read Piper through a new lens, and that lens caused me to see it differently than I would have six months ago.

“What’s best for students?” is usually the guiding question for my educational decision-making, but the answer is not clear this time. What aspects of this dilemma am I missing? How have other educators handled books by these authors? Do you still approve students who want to read Thirteen Reasons Why? Are The Maze Runner and its sequels still on the shelves of your classroom and school libraries? Is The All-True Diary of a Part-Time Indian still in your curriculum? How did you decide?

Thank you for reading, and especially for your insights.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized and tagged , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

5 Responses to Asher, Alexie, and Dashner: Believe the Women and Ban the Books?

  1. cricketmuse says:

    It becomes a minefield, doesn’t it? I used to show Bill Cosby monologue clips as Friday Fillers, but ceased. I don’t want to condone demeaning behavior, especially as a teacher. And now accountability has filtered into literature. Maybe open up the discussion with students—how do they feel about these books and the authors now?

    Liked by 1 person

  2. Mary Langer Thompson says:

    I agree with cricketmuse about opening up the discussion with students, perhaps beginning with William Butler Yeats poem “Among School Children” that asks “How Can We Know the Dancer from the Dance?”

    Liked by 1 person

  3. My first thought was also to open it to students for discussion. But I realized that in doing so, I would be abdicating my responsibility as an adult to offer guidance to young people who are still forming their own values and beliefs about right and wrong. Which then means needing to make my own judgement call about this sticky matter.

    I think I would recommend the books. Violence towards women committed by men in power in the entertainment industry warrants removing the access of these men to the positions of power over women. I can’t draw a connection like this between the works of the authors you cite and their abhorrent behavior. In other words, it’s not their products that have done harm.

    If we were to stop recommending these books based on the author’s actions, could we still teach Hemingway or Fitzgerald or any number of others? Then, if we do recommend or teach, don’t we need to open the issues that appear as we read? In other words, we know about these authors’ lives; do these lives affect their art, and us as readers? These are the questions I believe we become compelled to raise. Thanks for raising the questions.

    Liked by 1 person

    • Lorie says:

      I could have written this article, as those thoughts have been going through my mind. However, after reading the article, and some comments, I agree: the stories are separate from the actions of the author, and if we ban books based on behavior’s of the authors, then we are wiping out a wealth of literature. However, I won’t buy and/or read any future endeavors from these me .

      Liked by 2 people

  4. CrysHouse says:

    My students are required to read a text called The Education of Little Tree. Over the course of the text, we discuss the fact it was originally printed as nonfiction, the concept of the unreliable narrator, and the deeper issue of using dramatic irony to manipulate the feelings of the audience (and the ethics of that choice). When students finish the story, I present research and news articles (“The Tall Tale” by Randall and “What is Known and What Is Knowable” by Bollman”).

    After reading the articles, students are asked to determine whether or not authorship is an essential consideration when exposing others to or reading a text. I ask, “can a book be a good book if the author is not ‘good’?”

    It’s one of the best studies in critical thinking we do all year. Like you, I hesitate to censor texts for my students. Likewise, I dont believe it is my job to draw conclusions for my students and then present those conclusions to them. My job is to offer the information and allow them to use the processes I’ve taught to work through what’s in front of them.

    Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s